GovAI Radar · Pilot Program

Increase competitiveness. Drive AI for all.
Evidence-based AI overview for the public sector

Governments that understand where AI is deployed can steer regulation, direct subsidies, and shape incentives with precision, gaining strategic advantage in the international AI race. GovAI Radar provides the situational intelligence to make that possible in conjunction with the EU AI Act.

Only 42%↗

of people trust government to regulate new technologies appropriately

only about four in ten people find it likely their government will regulate new technologies in a manner that allows appropriate use (OECD 2026)

20%↗

of EU enterprises now actively use AI, up 6.5 pp in one year

of EU enterprises with 10 or more employees now actively use AI, up 6.5 pp from 13.5% one year prior (Eurostat 2025)

In force now↗

EU AI Act now requires active enforcement of its provisions

Enforcement pressure is rising: the EU AI Act now obliges states to actively enforce its provisions.

1.3 pp↗

annual AI-driven labour productivity growth in advanced economies

annual AI-driven labour productivity growth potential in advanced economies — governance determines which end of the range countries reach (OECD 2025)

Policy context

Effective AI governance begins with knowledge

AI applications are already being used in numerous sectors. Authorities currently lack a structured overview. Without an up-to-date evidence base, governance risks being reactive rather than anticipatory.

The EU AI Act database covers only a fraction of AI applications ⓘ

The EU AI Act provides for the registration of high-risk AI systems and general-purpose AI models with systemic risk. Providers are responsible for notifying the authorities or registering these systems. Furthermore, the authorities have no insight into what is in use below this risk threshold or where AI adoption is currently gaining momentum.

Legislation lags adoption

By the time a regulatory framework passes, AI capability and deployment patterns have shifted. This reduces protection against risks and stifles innovation. The EU AI Act creates obligations, but enforcement depends on knowing what is actually in use and where.

Platform capabilities

Four analytical layers for AI policy teams

Data aggregated from company registers, patent filings, scientific publications, and verified news sources. All outputs trace to primary sources, with risks and innovation signals surfaced before they reach regulatory attention.

01

Sector deployment map

Geographic view of AI adoption by sector and region across the EU, aggregated from company registers, EPO patent filings, Eurostat, and national statistical office data.

02

Real-time risk classification

Automated alignment of AI systems with EU AI Act risk categories. Emerging AI without formal classification is also assessed against EU legal principles in real time, flagging risks before they reach regulatory attention.

03

Innovation signals

Early-indicator tracking from patent filings, publications, and startup registrations, identifying emerging AI before it reaches regulatory attention.

04

Policy Agent

Ask policy questions in plain language. The Policy Agent answers from verified primary sources with direct links to the underlying data - only what is evidenced appears in the response.

Interactive prototype

Dashboard: EU Pilot

Use the tabs to navigate between views. Click map markers for detail and use the query interface in the Overview tab. Dashboard figures are illustrative pilot data.

GovAI Radar  ·  AI Deployment Intelligence Platform
Overview
Sectors
Risk Register
Sources
Innovation Impact
Jurisdiction 🇪🇺 European Union (Pilot)
Illustrative prototype data Data as of: Autumn 2026 · Pilot Phase
This dashboard displays illustrative data for demonstration purposes. Figures do not represent real AI system counts or regulatory findings.
AI Systems Tracked
28,400
across all sectors
+12% vs. prior month
Sectors Covered
15
of 15 target sectors
3 pipelines in setup
High-Risk Flags
84
EU AI Act Art. 6 scope
2 escalated this week
Verified Sources
1,240
primary data feeds
All feeds nominal
Regional AI Deployment IntensityLive
AI Adoption by Sector% of organisations
Risk Register: Top Flags8 Active
Innovation SignalsEmerging
Policy Query InterfaceSource-verified
AI
Germany deployment data is loaded. You can query sector adoption rates, EU AI Act compliance gaps, and innovation signals. All responses cite primary sources.
AI Adoption by Sector: Germany 2026% of organisations with active AI systems
IDSectorSystem / ApplicationRiskEU AI Act Ref.StatusFlagged
Illustrative figures based on sector-level AI adoption data and published productivity research. Numbers are indicative, not forecasts.
Total Value Potential
€2.8B
est. annual EU economic value (illustrative)
Across 6 sectors
Governance Quality Gap
0.9 pp
additional productivity with strong vs. weak governance
OECD 2025
Workforce AI Readiness
17%
of employees with AI skills training in SMEs
65% efficiency gap remains
Economic & Innovation Impact by SectorIllustrative
Pilot program

Request access to the pilot

We are welcoming up to 5 government teams into the first pilot cohort. Participation is free. Participants receive full dashboard access and help shape the future of the platform.

About

GovAI Radar is built by a team with roots in public-sector practice and digital policy research.

Contact: info@next-gen-governance.eu

Andrea Schaefer
Public Sector Expert

Andrea Schaefer is an expert in the public sector with many years of experience working on both the government and parliamentary sides. She holds degrees in Law and Innovation Management. Her work focuses on a digital state that combines innovation with benefits for society.

Vincent Müller
Co-founder & Software Developer

Vincent Müller is a software developer and computer scientist. He brings experience at the intersection of digital systems, administrative logic, and software-based implementation. His focus is on how technological possibilities can be translated in ways that make them relevant, applicable, and effective for public institutions.

Supported by